River example from lecture: erinevus redaktsioonide vahel
Mine navigeerimisribale
Mine otsikasti
Resümee puudub |
Resümee puudub |
||
| 25. rida: | 25. rida: | ||
% try also this: | % try also this: | ||
%-connectedw(ve,p). | % -connectedw(ve,p). | ||
% the next outcommented version of the negated question | % the next outcommented version of the negated question | ||
| 31. rida: | 31. rida: | ||
% and gkc should heavily focus on that clause | % and gkc should heavily focus on that clause | ||
fof(q,negated_conjecture, | % fof(q,negated_conjecture, | ||
-canpaddle(ve,m)). | % -canpaddle(ve,m)). | ||
</pre> | </pre> | ||
Viimane redaktsioon: 28. veebruar 2020, kell 14:28
flowsto(ve,v). flowsto(e,p). flowsto(n,m). flowsfrom(e,v). flowsfrom(n,p). -flowsfrom(X,Y) | canpaddle(Y,X). -flowsto(X,Y) | canpaddle(X,Y). -canpaddle(X,Y) | -canpaddle(Y,Z) | canpaddle(X,Z). -flowsfrom(X,Y) | -flowsfrom(Y,Z) | flowsfrom(X,Z). -flowsto(X,Y) | -flowsto(Y,Z) | flowsto(X,Z). -flowsfrom(X,Y) | connectedw(X,Y). -flowsto(X,Y) | connectedw(X,Y). -connectedw(X,Y) | -connectedw(Y,Z) | connectedw(X,Z). -connectedw(X,Y) | connectedw(Y,Z). % our negated question -canpaddle(ve,m). % try also this: % -connectedw(ve,p). % the next outcommented version of the negated question % is a way to tell gkc that this is indeed a question % and gkc should heavily focus on that clause % fof(q,negated_conjecture, % -canpaddle(ve,m)).